Archive for May 3rd, 2005

Recent email exchange –

From: Staci
To: Charlsiekate
Date: May 2, 2005 9:22 PM
Subject: the evidence exam

Since you are not online and I am desparately trying to not read my con law outline, I thought I would email to see if you have recovered yet from that brutal raping that was the evidence exam. I, for one, am really upset at Ron Carlson. I am traumatized by the fact that I may have gotten every multiple choice question wrong. Yes, all 95 could be incorrect. Please write me back with your take on the exam. Charlsie, I really don’t think I can keep studying. I am already so defeated.

From: Charlsiekate
To: Staci
Date: May 3, 2005 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: the evidence exam

Hey! I’m sorry it has taken me so long to respond, I have been trying to pick up the pieces of my life after that exam. I think there is a good chance that I also got every single question wrong. At 3:45 I was only on question 35 of the multiple choice. So it took me an hour and a half to do 35 multiple choice questions. Which left me an hour and twenty minutes to do 60 multiple choice questions. How many pages was the exam? 70? Really, I don’t know what he was thinking. I was shaking, and sweating, and I couldn’t breathe – and this continued for hours. I ran 4 1/2 miles afterwards, that I can’t remember at all, and then I drank a little wine with Cybil last night, needless today I didn’t get out of bed until late this morning. No kidding I am going to fail con law on thursday in the same way that I failed evidence. I’ll never be prepared for Well’s exam. And then natural resources 16 hours after I walk out of con law. Exams are really bad for my self esteem. quite traumatizing.

See old Comments | See old Trackbacks

Read Full Post »